Indian Crypto Investors Push Back Against Tax Rules, Calling Regime Disproportionate

India’s cryptocurrency tax framework is increasingly being questioned by investors, with a clear majority viewing the current structure as unfair and restrictive. A recent survey highlights widespread dissatisfaction over high tax rates, rigid transaction levies, and the inability to offset losses. While policymakers introduced these measures to improve oversight and revenue collection, market participants argue that the approach has dampened trading activity and weakened India’s competitiveness in the global digital asset economy. The findings underscore a growing disconnect between regulatory objectives and investor sentiment at a time when crypto adoption continues to expand.

Rising Discontent Among Crypto Investors
A substantial share of Indian cryptocurrency investors believe the country’s tax regime places an excessive burden on digital asset participants. Survey results show that nearly two-thirds of respondents consider the current framework inequitable, reflecting frustration across both retail and professional investor segments. The perception of unfairness stems not only from the headline tax rate but also from structural constraints that limit flexibility and risk management.

This sentiment has become more pronounced as crypto assets gain broader acceptance globally, prompting investors to compare India’s policies with those of other major markets.

Structure of India’s Crypto Tax Policy
Under existing rules, income generated from virtual digital assets is taxed at a flat rate of 30 percent. In addition, a 1 percent tax deducted at source applies to each transaction, regardless of profitability. Losses incurred in crypto trading cannot be offset against gains, nor can they be carried forward to subsequent years.

Investors argue that this structure treats crypto differently from equities, commodities, and other financial instruments, where loss adjustments and graduated tax rates are standard. The result, they say, is a system that taxes activity rather than net returns.

Impact on Market Participation
Industry participants report that the tax framework has had a measurable effect on trading behavior. Transaction volumes on domestic platforms have moderated, while some active traders have curtailed activity to limit tax exposure. Others have reportedly shifted toward long-term holding strategies or explored overseas alternatives.

Analysts note that the transaction-level levy has been particularly disruptive, as it reduces liquidity and increases the cost of frequent trading. Over time, this could weaken India’s position as a hub for crypto innovation and investment.

Balancing Oversight and Growth
From the government’s perspective, strict taxation is seen as a tool to enhance transparency, discourage speculative excess, and ensure compliance in a volatile market. Policymakers have emphasized caution, citing risks related to consumer protection and financial stability.
However, experts argue that overly rigid taxation may undermine these goals if it drives activity away from regulated channels. A calibrated approach, they suggest, could achieve oversight without stifling participation or innovation.

Calls for Policy Reassessment
The survey has renewed calls from investors and industry bodies for a reassessment of crypto taxation. Suggested reforms include allowing loss offsets, reducing transaction-level taxes, and aligning crypto taxation more closely with other asset classes.

As digital assets mature and institutional interest grows, India faces a pivotal decision. Adapting its tax framework to reflect market realities could foster sustainable growth and compliance, while maintaining the status quo risks alienating investors in a rapidly evolving financial sector.